The Videos of and Allegations Against Donald Trump


billy-bush-donald-trump-and-soap-actress-arianne-zucker-circa-2005d-jpeg

The most recent ruckus involving the surfaced videos of and allegations against Donald Trump has been a top subject of supreme discussion and debate all around the nation. Media pundits and journalists have been on record, including top Republican officials such as governors, congressmen, and senators, as blasting Trump over the comments he made circa 2005 regarding a conversation he had with then-Access Hollywood star Billy Bush (who’s a current, although now suspended, co-host of NBC‘s Today Show) – a conversation regarding a woman that Trump failed to hit on (who turns out to be none other than then-Hollywood Access lead star Nancy O’Dell) that was caught on a hot microphone in which he stated the following:* {*Note: A video is included as well.]

Donald Trump: I moved on her, and I failed. I’ll admit it.** [**Second Note: The tape was recorded several months after he married his third wife, Melania, who was pregnant with their son Barron.]

Another Voice: Whoa!

Trump: I did try and fuck her. She was married. [Continues.]  And I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping. She wanted to get some furniture. I said, “I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.” 

Trump: I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn’t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony tits and everything. She’s totally changed her look.”

 [At that point in the recording, Trump and Bush begin to notice and see Arianne Zucker, the star of Days of Our Lives who is waiting to escort them into the soap opera set of the show.]

Billy Bush: Your girl’s hot as shit. In the purple.

Trump: Whoa! Whoa! I’ve got to use some Tic Tacs, just in case I start kissing her. You know I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.

Billy Bush: Whatever you want.” 

Trump: Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.

Of course the Donald was on the Howard Stern Show circa 1997, making horrendous comments about women with whom he has had sex, referring to the acts as his “personal Vietnam,” which can be viewed in the following video:

Here’s a YouTube of that video as well:

 

It doesn’t help the fact that People Magazine journalist Natasha Stoynoff recalls her encounter with Trump, in which she claims that the Donald “sexually assaulted” her. This is how she details it:

people-magazine-writer-natasha-stoynoff-says-trump-sexually-assaulted-her-in-december-of-2005-part-0-clip-0-10-12-2016

people-magazine-writer-natasha-stoynoff-says-trump-sexually-assaulted-her-in-december-of-2005-part-1-clip-1-10-12-2016

people-magazine-writer-natasha-stoynoff-says-trump-sexually-assaulted-her-in-december-of-2005-part-2-clip-2-10-12-2016

people-magazine-writer-natasha-stoynoff-says-trump-sexually-assaulted-her-in-december-of-2005-part-3-clip-3-10-12-2016

people-magazine-writer-natasha-stoynoff-says-trump-sexually-assaulted-her-in-december-of-2005-part-4-clip-4-10-12-2016

people-magazine-writer-natasha-stoynoff-says-trump-sexually-assaulted-her-in-december-of-2005-part-5-clip-5-10-12-2016

Of course, according to an NBC News piece titled “The Allegations Women Have Made Against Donald Trump,” there have been allegations advanced by other women and individuals such as Trump’s ex-wife Ivana (who claims, as revived by the Daily Beast, that he “raped” her in 1989 but didn’t open up to that account until she reportedly told her friends about it, which basically and partly the subject of a  1993 published book titled “Lost Tycoon: The Many Lives of Donald Trump,”) Jill Harth (1992), Jane Doe (1994), former Miss Utah Temple Daggart McDowell (1997), former Miss Washington Cassandra Searless (2013), some former crew of The Apprentice, former Miss Vermont Teen USA Maria Billado , former Miss New Mexico Teen USA Victoria Hughes, other unnamed Miss USA pageants (2001), former Miss Arizona Tasha Dixon (2001), Jessica Leeds (1980s), Rachel Crooks (2005), Mindy McGillivay (2003), Kristin Anderson (1990s), The Apprentice Season Five contestant Summer Zervos (2007), former Miss New Hampshire Bridget Sullivan, and New York City resident Cathy Heller (1997). Other people include an unnamed friend of CNN reporter and OutFront host Erin Burnett (2010) and former Miss North Carolina Samantha Holvey (2006).

 

nbc-news-allegations-women-have-made-against-donald-trump-part-0-clip-0-10-15-2016

nbc-news-allegations-women-have-made-against-donald-trump-part-1-clip-1-10-15-2016

nbc-news-allegations-women-have-made-against-donald-trump-part-2-clip-2-10-15-2016

nbc-news-allegations-women-have-made-against-donald-trump-part-3-clip-3-10-15-2016



nbc-news-allegations-women-have-made-against-donald-trump-part-4-clip-4-10-15-2016
nbc-news-allegations-women-have-made-against-donald-trump-part-5-clip-5-10-15-2016
nbc-news-allegations-women-have-made-against-donald-trump-part-5-clip-5-10-15-2016nbc-news-allegations-women-have-made-against-donald-trump-part-6-clip-6-10-15-2016nbc-news-allegations-women-have-made-against-donald-trump-part-7-clip-7-10-15-2016

nbc-news-allegations-women-have-made-against-donald-trump-part-8-clip-8-10-15-2016

nbc-news-allegations-women-have-made-against-donald-trump-part-9-clip-9-10-15-2016

nbc-news-allegations-women-have-made-against-donald-trump-part-10-clip-10-10-15-2016

 

nbc-news-allegations-women-have-made-against-donald-trump-part-11-clip-11-10-15-2016

Once the videos and the allegations came out, it’s become a media storm ever since. U.S. House of Representative Jason Chaffetz, according to Politico, told CNN in the following video:

Even Paul Ryan can’t stomach Trump’s remarks in the videos, and he probably can’t even stomach the allegations that come with those said remarks. Trump has since attacked Ryan with a new Twitter offensive against the congressman.

Celebrities like Emmy Rossum and Rosie O’Donnell became outraged by what Donald said. And they kept tweeting, becoming angry by what they had seen and heard from a man who thinks grabbing a “woman’s pussy” is A-okay.

Here’s Emmy’s tweet on the subject:

 

emmy-rossum-tweets-against-trump-clip-1-10-07-2016

Here’s another tweet of hers:
emmy-rossum-tweets-against-trump-part-2-clip-2-10-07-2016

Here’s Rosie’s tweet about what Media Matters posted on Twitter:

(I’m also including three videos that aired on CNN which happen to be on-air, publicized clashes between anti-Trump Republican Ana Navarro and Trump shill Scottie Nell Hughes.)

Video 1:

YouTube:

Video 2:

YouTube:

Video 3:

YouTube:

rosies-tweets-and-retweets-on-trump-clip-1-10-18-2016

And here’s a posting of tweets Rosie made on October 9:

rosies-tweets-and-retweets-on-trump-part-2-clip-2-10-18-2016

 

MY THOUGHTS ON THE TRUMP VIDEOS AND ALLEGATIONS MATTER

Here’s the reality that everyone seems to be forgetting. I condemn what former President Bill Clinton did to Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey,  and Juanita Broaddrick. The fact that he had a much-publicized dalliance with a White House intern made me nauseas for days and months on end in the mid-to-late 1990s; however, it was consensual, despite the fact that it was shameful of him to cheat on Hillary at the time. But rulers in positions of powers have done that for centuries. Has anyone heard the sexual activities of England’s King Henry VIII? Did anyone know that Ann Boleyn was raped while still married to the King at the time?

At the same time I condemn what Trump has said on these videos and also condemn him for making these statements. After all, Bill Clinton and Donald Trump are morally-bankrupt, ethically-bankrupt, and anti-freedom reprehensible reprobates, and Hillary is a war machine-producing, pro-military (yet anti-troop), anti-freedom reprobate as well. They all are vicious liars – pathetic to the core, corrupt in mind, body, and soul, and evil to the bone. The Trump supporters are trying to make excuses for Trump’s putrid and repugnant behavior. That doesn’t sit well with most of the electorate, and I think that matters in the grand scheme of things.

Trump supporters say that this was “locker room talk” and that women do the same thing when they talk to other women in private, even if the conversation’s on hot mike. Personally I don’t know a single woman who has told her girl friends their version of a so-called locker room talk the following: “See that guy Tim Tebow over there? I would love to have his hot and juicy hard cock bouncing around in the back of my throat while I’m gagging off of him. I mean, who wouldn’t dream of his Ball Park hot dog squirting mozarella cheese into the back of my throat? Man, if he squirted his chewy semen into my mouth, I would swish it around like it was Crest mouthwash.”

But that’s just it. A woman would have far more dignity than that to say that about a guy whom she just saw, and a guy would have far more dignity than to say that about a woman whom he just met. No guy and girl would ever say that about anyone. I don’t know anyone who would say shit like that. Some guys and girls might joke around a bit, but they know their real limits. The questions that no one is asking are these: would anyone say these things in private, let alone in public, whether you’re on a hot microphone or not? If you were a woman, would you say them? I don’t think so. If you were a guy, would you do the same about a woman? I don’t think so either. I don’t in public and private. I’m better than that, and people should be, especially about people whom they don’t know from Adam.

Sheldon Richman, writing in his Free Association blog, pens the following:

sheldon-richman-condemning-sexual-assault-is-too-easy-the-piece-by-itself-10-14-2016

He’s right and wrong. He’s right in saying that Obama’s murders and havoc at home and abroad are the real issues, and not the sexual assault matter. But sexual assaults do matter. They matter more than anyone else will ever know.

And it’s time – high time – that we address this concern for what it is. It is a problem here in the U.S.

What I find objectionable from the left and the celebrities talking about Trump is that, while they condemn what Trump has done and it does need to be condemned, they don’t condemn what ISIS and other Arab leaders and Arab men in their native homelands do to women, as far as raping and sexually assaulting them. Rape culture is predominant there, not here. The Patriarchy exists there, not here.

Can’t we all just be honest for a change? Please? Is that too much to ask?

Conservative Republican Hit Woman – Ahem, Author and Pundit – Ann Coulter Tells Fox Business’s John Stossel That She Wants “to Drown Him” Over His Support for Libertarian “Spoilers” in General Elections

Conservative Republican hit woman – ahem, author and pundit – Ann Coulter recently appeared on Fox Business‘s Stossel to attack show host John Stossel and other libertarians like him for supporting and voting for Libertarian candidates and voting against Republicans in the mid-term election this year because of Republicans’ refusal to radically shrink the cost, size, and scope of the State. Not surprised, right? After all, mouthpieces for the big GOP establishment like Coulter are nothing new in the world of GOP politics, except that her knee-jerk reactionary ideology gets the best of her when she makes ludicrous statements in print as well as on television, especially Fox News and Fox Business. It’s even worse – and funnier might I add – when you see her cobwebbed conservative Republican face on Real Time with Bill Maher every now and then. It’s worse for her to make a fool of herself on paper and on the airwaves.

Stossel’s reference to Coulter wanting to drown libertarians like him is due to a piece that Coulter wrote in her nationally-syndicated column, specifically a September 17th piece entitled “Your ‘To Do’ List to Save America,” in which, at the end of her article, she writes:

The biggest current danger for Republicans is that idiots will vote for Libertarian candidates in do-or-die Senate elections, including Kentucky, Kansas, North Carolina and Colorado. (That’s in addition to the ‘Independent’ in Kansas who’s a Democrat.) Democratic candidates don’t have to put up with this crap — they’re even trying to dump the official Democrat in Kansas to give the stealth Democrat a better shot.

When we’re all dying from lack of health care across the United States of Mexico, we’ll be deeply impressed with your integrity, libertarians.

What an arrogant, pompous idiot she is, considering that she supports establishment Republicans who want to grow the cost, size, and scope of the State as much as the Democrats do, just only a bit slower might I say.

And then here’s the grand finale to her non-sequitor argument against libertarians voting for capital (L) Libertarians:

Which brings me to my final assignment this week: If you are considering voting for the Libertarian candidate in any Senate election, please send me your name and address so I can track you down and drown you.

Really, Coulter? You really want to go down there? Have you forgotten that you came to the Libertarian Party of Connecticut in 1999 because you wanted to run for Congress under my party’s banner? Must I also point out that the Connecticut Libertarians turned you down – and rightfully so! – because they discovered that your real reason for running for office was to take away votes from then-Republican congressman Chris Shays as an act to punish him for not voting to impeach then-President Bill Clinton over his politicized and sexualized affair with Monica Lewinsky? Of course, your pathetically preposterous social conservative views had a great deal to do with it, considering you think we Libertarians “obsess” over drug legalization (a la ending the War on Drugs) that you’ve been spoon-feeding your bullshit socially and politically conservative views on that matter and other private matters to the American electorate and viewers for far so long? How about that, Ann? Or have we already forgotten about that? Selective memory you must have, right?

After all, in your September 25, 2000 syndicated article “I’d Burn My Neighbor’s House Down” explains in full detail about the fact that you were trying to run a “sham campaign” – in other words, a fraudulent congressional campaign race – against Shays (once again I say this because he was a Republican congressman!) at the time because he refused to vote for Clinton’s impeachment, and your “campaign” was only contrived and orchestrated to put a Democrat in Shay’s seat.

Here’s the entire piece for everyone to read about what you did in 1999:

 

I’d burn down my neighbor’s house

Ann Coulter

9/25/2000 12:00:00 AM – Ann Coulter
I did everything I could, and it’s not my fault. As a legal resident of the noble Fourth District of Connecticut — once represented by glamorous, brilliant, smart aleck Claire Booth Luce, and currently represented by a phony, ponderous, hand-wringing pantywaist — I tried to take out the pantywaist. For those of you who don’t have Irish Alzheimer’s (we forget everything but our grudges), Rep. Chris Shays was one of only five Republicans to vote against the impeachment of a lying, felonious, contemptible president; one of only two Republicans to go on a whirlwind grandstanding campaign against the impeachment of the lying, felonious, contemptible president; and the only Republican called on by Rep. John Conyers on the day of the vote to argue against impeachment of a lying, felonious, contemptible president. I didn’t run in the primary against Shays because, as a writer, I’d have to give up my livelihood to do so. If I were a dentist, I could continue to remove molars while campaigning against Shays; as a writer, I’d have to abandon my career the moment I announce. I’ll give up a month or two for a grudge match, but not six, seven or eight.

Moreover, an excellent Connecticut Republican, Jim Campbell, did step up to the plate to oppose the pantywaist, offering Nutmeggers the enticing prospect not only of being a Republican, but also of representing the district rather than The New York Times. No one had ever heard of Campbell. He emerged from nowhere, and the principleless Connecticut Republican Party establishment was dead-set against him. (If Joseph Stalin called himself a Republican and ran for office in Connecticut, he’d have the full backing of the state party apparatchiks.) Still, Campbell took about 40 percent of the vote from Shays. Though I wasn’t willing to sacrifice my profession (and life) for the absolute minimum six months it would have required to run in a primary, I was willing to forsake my profession (and life) for about six weeks simply to achieve the greater glory of causing Shays to lose. My idea was that I’d run a total sham, media-intensive, third-party Jesse Ventura campaign for one month before the election, and hope for enough votes to cause the (official) Democrat to win. I just needed to find a third party that would have me. Since I hate the government, and the Libertarians hate the government, I figured — that’s my party. Except the thing is, the Libertarians’ opposition to government is narrowly focused on only one small aspect of government: the drug laws. Until several weeks of negotiations with the Connecticut Libertarian Party over its pro-drug legalization stance, my position on drugs was to refuse even to discuss drug legalization until I don’t have to pay for the food, housing, transportation and medical care of people who want to stay home all day shooting up heroin. It’s not as if we live in the perfect Libertarian state of nature, with the tiny exception of those pesky drug laws. We live in a Nanny State that takes care of us from cradle to grave and steals half our income. I kept suggesting to them that we might want to keep our eye on the ball here. (The Libertarians’ other big issue is privatizing Yosemite. Seriously.) In theory, our areas of agreement should have included, among other things: eliminating the Department of Health and Human Services, eliminating the Department of Education, eliminating the Department of Commerce, eliminating the National Endowment of the Arts, eliminating the National Endowment for the Humanities, eliminating the Department of Agriculture, eliminating the Department of Housing and Urban Development, eliminating the Department of Transportation, eliminating the progressive income tax and instituting a flat tax. Our sole area of disagreement was whether to abolish the drug laws before or after completing the above tasks. That wasn’t enough. I was deemed not a “true Libertarian” because my position was to defer the drug legalization issue until we had made a little more headway in dismantling the Nanny State. There’s a joke about a Frenchman, an Englishman and a Russian who are told they have only one day until the end of the world. The Frenchman says he will spend his last day with a bottle of Bordeaux and a beautiful woman. The Englishman says he will take his favorite sheepdog for a walk across the moors. The Russian says he will burn down his neighbor’s house. I’m with the Russian. Consequently, I have moved from being completely uninterested in drug legalization to being virulently, passionately opposed to it. So I’m initiating a periodic series of articles on the stupidity of drug legalization — it’s my newest Irish Alzheimer’s.

Here’s Coulter’s appearance on Stossel. You’ll see how fruity this bitch really is!

Ann Coulter, go jump off a cliff! We don’t need your moronic lectures, the world doesn’t need you, and nobody needs you. You are the problem, not the solution. What part of that will you not get at all? A blonde statist like you really lives up to the “dumb blonde” stereotype very well, not to mention the fact that you are a soulless political cash whore with an axe to grind against us Libertarians. You are definitely more like a typical Democrat (with very few minute differences) than you will ever concede to being and admit. You are Lady Liberty’s worst enemy, not her best ally. Remember that, bitch!

I rest my frickin’ case if everyone doesn’t mind me saying so!