Former Libertarian Party of Michigan Chair and Vice Chair Kim McCurry Leaves The LP for Good, Pathetically Outlining Her Reasons for Her Departure

Former Libertarian Party of Michigan Chair and Vice Chair Kim McCurry writes an open letter to all Libertarians in the Libertarian Party, the LPM, and the entire movement, publishes it on Liberty Chronicle, and posts it on her Facebook wall, announcing her decision to bolt from the Party…..for good**. Rumors had it for months that she was on her way out of the Party, but nothing was officially confirmed by her colleagues, her friends, her allies, and Hers Truly…..until now.

With all candor, it’s neither shocking nor surprising nor unexpected that she would make this move. However, that entirely said, I’m glad that she is leaving the Party. And good riddance too!

I will outline my reasons for making that statement, yet it’s time to take a good look at her article and her Facebook post and comments which also contain statements and opinions uttered by other Libertarian Party members as well as former members who, for all intents and purposes, despise and cannot stand the Party. That’s about the size of it.

First things first, let’s show the evidence of her open letter which she penned to all Party members who either liked her at all or disliked her all the way.

This is what she wrote, which she submitted to the Liberty Chronicle. The staff there was more than thrilled to publish her piece to their server so it can be perused on the World Wide Web.

That’s all that was put up on the Chronicle’s site.

Now let’s take a look at her Facebook post and the ensuing comments that followed in response.

Well, now that you’ve read both the Liberty Chronicle article and her Facebook post, her comments, and her fellow LP and LPM member comments, you’ve got to admit that her narcissistic, condescending, insulting, bitchy, backstabbing, backbiting, and high school drama-esque demeanor really show in her piece and post…..don’t they?

Here’s the ugly and real-world truth about McCurry. She has publicly gone forward with her hateful, vile, and spiteful comments about the Party and a number of people. Her libelous statements on people and her attacks toward me are reflective of her shady personality that she has kept well-hidden while playing the role of a nice Libertarian Party member and supporter in such a carefully-constructed manipulated way. She has deceived many in the Party circles by claiming to be a real Libertarian who has taken the non-aggression principle seriously and signed the Pledge which is the heart and soul of the NAP and pretending to agree with me on a number of issues. Now I’m thinking that perhaps she never has at all, and she has been lying to me and to so many in our trusted circles from the very start.

When I was recording the Libertarian Executive Committee (LEC) meeting with my iPhone at the party headquarters in Lansing on December 7th, 2016, former LPM Chair Bill Gelineau asked me to cease recording considering other members of the board discovered that I was recording via Facebook Live Video (considering I never ask for authorization). Immediately the board began to consider a resolution to oppose video streaming as well as video recording during its meetings because their claim was that sensitive discussions including treasurer reports would be made public on FB. LPM Treasurer Jason Brandenburg began the first step to authorize a resolution. However, Gelineau gave me the opportunity to speak in my defense. I basically told the board that not everyone in the Party can attend meetings, that the LEC is a political party and must be a transparent organization, and the membership has a right to know what’s transpiring during the sessions.

I made a compromise (against my better judgment) with the committee that I would not record during Brandenburg‘s treasurer reports (considering he was the Treasurer throughout the tenure of the previous LEC)…..and has since been re-elected to his party seat, making him an incumbent.

What also hasn’t been made public is that LEC At-Large Representative Jeff Wood (who is now Regional Representative District #8) came to my rescue by defending my First Amendment-protected rights. He told the board that I had done nothing wrong and that I was well within my rights to record the meetings because, as I stated before, it is about transparency on the board and in the Party. It is about holding and keeping our political party accountable for everything that it does – ideologically and financially and an establishment of a strong work ethic and relationship with its members. It’s about maintaining ethics and humility in the Party and restoring principles that the Party has been lacking for years.

When I made the compromise, Kim in her vice chair role looked at me while sitting at the board table with her laptop up and running said, “Thank you, Todd!” She said that because I ended up being used, manipulated, and treated like a doormat the entire time while I was there. She never at once defended my right to free speech within the Party and had no interest in doing so. She was nothing but currying favor with Gelineau just simply by kissing his political ass and ensuring conservativesque control of the Party.

This is the same Bill Gelineau who has gone public with his support for ObamaCare – a move that has metastasized to many circles among us. And yet he calls himself a libertarian, let alone a Libertarian.

Here’s another reason why it’s a good thing that she left the Party. She lied about LPM member Keith Butkovich when she accused him of stalking her more than a year ago. I spoke with Keith regarding this incident. I have no reason *NOT* to believe a word of what he’s said to me. He told me that when Kim pursued a stalking charge that she filed against him (even after she filed a restraining order against him*), the presiding magistrate found that there was insufficient evidence to warrant a prosecution and conviction against him. Thus the case was ultimately tossed out of court. Keith won the trial because the judge ruled in his favor. Jeff Wood even confirmed this with me on this when we were talking on the phone Wednesday evening.

Therefore, Keith has every legal right, with the help of his attorney, to litigate against her for committing libel against him. And he is in the right to do exactly that.

This shows how deceitful and how much of a pathological liar she truly is. What an unfortunate truth that the members will be forced to contend with this undeniable fact.

After she blatantly attacked me in May of this year because I believe that many Libertarians left the Party because they didn’t like the comments made by LP National Chair Arvin Chair regarding the U.S. military, I called her while I was on the road driving to my wound care clinic one day. When we briefly talked about it, she said, “I was waiting for you to calm down.” That’s in reference to the both of us not talking for a few days after the online exchange. And yet I was not buying her bullshit. Keep in mind that this happened more than two months ago when we weren’t talking for a few weeks. I didn’t think that she was honest with me, but then you could never tell when she was dishonest completely.

How about the fact that, at the LEC meeting in June of 2016, she supported Brandenburg’s resolution (which was ultimately passed and went into effect) which called for the suspension of Libertarian Party member and Livingston candidate for sheriff James Weeks II …..all because he stripped at the Party’s national convention at the Rosen Centre in Orlando, Florida on May 30, 2016? I attended that meeting as a matter of fact, so I recorded it, despite the fact that Party member (and former LPM gubernatorial candidate) Mary Buzuma objected to it? (I suspect that her objection carried some weight with many of the LEC board members who would try to censor me with Bill Gelineau and Kim’s help because of my predilection for and a penchant of recording the board’s meetings at the December 7th meeting.)

I’m not sorry that she’s flown the Libertarian coop. Perhaps, by returning to the Republicans (where she was from originally), she will be of better use to them. Perhaps she will be an asset to the Republican Liberty Caucus.

Here’s the part that I find very troubling about her:

As a Libertarian, I resent her claim that people saw us as “Republicans who like to smoke weed.” That’s not what we’re about. That’s not what we have ever been about and will ever be about. Yes, there are many Libertarians – even some of us – who do enjoy and love smoking weed, but we’re more than that. We want freedom *NOT* only for ourselves but also for every single American and for all throughout the entire world. We want unrestricted liberty, not just *ONLY* to smoke cannabis. We want it now! We’ve already wanted it before Obama and even after him.

Yes, we don’t like taxes. Conservatives used to be against taxes at one time. That was decades ago obviously. Then they saw the writing on the wall and threw in the towel just to become statists. Today’s conservatives just want “tax reform” and “cutting taxes,” not repealing taxes like they used to many decades ago. They just want to replace ObamaCare and not replace it, even though they were calling for repeal and replacement and before that a repeal of the system briefly, not ending the government’s involvement in health care many decades ago. I could go down the list, but you get the point.

It’s both condescending and insulting that she conflates us classical liberals with progressive liberals in the Party. Progressives are Commie-lites. They want government involvement in the economy and high taxes as they love taxation, yet we classical liberals (or libertarians) want no taxes and want the State to cease to function. It’s that simple.

It makes her look bad when she says that she wants anarchists, anti-taxers, anti-government, anti-Drug War, and unregulated economy advocates pushed out of the Party. If you’re not Republican-lite for her, she wants you gone. There’s no question about it.

Goodbye, Kim. Sayonara. Adios! Don’t let the door hit you on the air now, you hear?

*Update 1: Kim actually filed a personal protection order, not a restraining order, against Keith Butkovich. This is a correction made via a request from him.

**Update 2: Some additional screenshots by Kim and her friends who blocked me on Facebook. I couldn’t get any of these via my current Facebook account because Kim has blocked me, but I used my alternative FB account to look at the posts in question.

Here they are.

That’s all I have on the screenshots.

I hope Kim got what she wanted overall. I believe she did.

Advertisements

The Libertarian Party of Illinois’s Letter to the Libertarian National Committee Calling for the Ouster of Vice-Chair Arvin Vohra

 

After Libertarian National Committee Vice-Chair Arvin Vohra made the comments about why young men are tricked into joining the military and who have made the decision to do it especially for the wrong reasons, the Libertarian Party of Illinois has done something that no state party has done within the last number of years. That “done something” is this: that state party has officially called for the booting of Vohra from the LNC immediately. This is in light of Vohra’s statements on the military and war establishment which were posted on this blog and the continuous showcasing of what the pro-war crowd has tried to do to Vohra since then.

Here’s the letter from the state party calling for throwing him out of the National Committee:

By taking Arvin’s statement out of context, that entire state-run affiliate has been invaded, pervaded, and infiltrated by a bunch of warmongers. None of them love libertarianism and liberty by the way.

This is another sign of the ultra-moderates and the conservatives collaborating to destroy the Party from within and to throw out of our organization good men like Vohra. This is sad, heartbreaking, and full of fear now that my colleagues and I will fight for the soul of the Party in New Orleans, Louisiana in 2018.

Tsk, tsk, tsk…..

Update #1: Here are three comments made to the letter and Vohra personally and politically so far.

Let me show you the screenshot for that.

 

The Various Members of the Libertarian Party Pushing for Persecution of Libertarian National Committee Vice-Chair Arvin Vohra Over His Anti-Military and Anti-War Establishment Comments Part 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Two weeks ago Libertarian National Committee Vice-Chair Arvin Vohra wrote and posted a commentary on his Facebook wall in which he made a highly contentious, uproarious statement saying that young men join the U.S. military for a variety of wrong reasons. It is estimated that half the party base sides with Arvin on the military and foreign policy of non-interventionism, and the other half of the same base wants him to either resign, be removed from his vice-chair position, and/or removed from the Libertarian Party as a whole.

Here are more screenshots for people who want to see how belligerent, volatile, and juvenile many in the Party are:

To be specific, Indiana James (not to be confused with Indiana Jones!) stated the following:

That’s exactly what he wrote in his comments. Now onto the other screenshots:

What strikes me as a curious statement is from Libby Randi who says specifically here:

Really, Libby? Really?

Furthermore, here are more screenshots:

Here’s the second line from Dani White which is highly fundamental:

 

 

Here are the rest of the screenshots:

Here’s more into depth with Judd Weiss’s weigh-in on the ruckus:

Anyhow, here are the last remaining screenshots:

Here’s more on what Roy Britton Scherer said to Steve Toffanelli as well. They both go back and forth with each other, all the while both men are right and wrong regarding their viewpoints:

Alex Biro goes further on this, all the while spewing his invective and a modicum of hate towards Vohra and the entire national leadership:

The final screenshots on Arvin’s wall are here for everyone to peruse:

Ok, let’s get to the bottom of some of the posts that I find confusing with some screenshots to them.

On screenshot #6, this is what Chris Silver wrote completely:

On screenshot #15, this is what asshole party member Andrew Helmstetter wrote to Arvin, attacking him because he told the truth and Helmstetter didn’t like the truth coming about the military:

And Anthony fucking Dlugos is the ultra-moderate who loves to marginalize the purists – including Yours Truly – when it comes to strong, solid issues regarding our party positions, our party base, and the future of the Party. Honestly, he needs to fucking get out of the LP and head for the Republicans….or maybe the Democrats.

Either way, I don’t fucking care.

Also on the same screenshot (as I label it “Screenshot 15(B),” a party member by the name of Rich Turvey – and I have no idea why he’s in the Party because he doesn’t believe in Liberty 100% – attacks our chairman in response to his commentary with the following:

When you have fucking idiots like these people, you know the Party itself is in serious trouble and on a death spiral. Hugh McDonnell can go fuck himself.

Here is some of the hilarious stuff between butthurt asshole fuckwad Zach Garretson and some of the most respected people who are standing up for truth. The truth hurts, doesn’t it, Zachy Boy?

As for Italian stallion Anthony Dlugos, he wouldn’t know what a war was if his ass were strapped to a SCUD missile. He’s a delusional freak and a pro-war monster. He never accepted our Party philosophy, but yet we welcomed him anyway. Fucking sick and pathetic.

Here’s the rest of Garretson’s statement from the LP Veterans Caucus:

On screenshot #20, LP members Cathy Smith, Will Smith (not to be confused with good-looking actor Will Smith), and Christopher Hicks, in their assholish, insulting, condescending, and marginalizing way, called for Vohra to resign. Michael Sanchez, a party member and a dipshit, says nothing of great and paramount value here.  It’s the same with asshole Michael Lawrence. At least Bob Broda has the moxie, the chutzpah, and the balls to tell things like they are:

Specifically, Bob said in part that brings the point closer to home:

On screenshot #23, Justin O’Donnell spoke out of two sides of his mouth when he addressed his gripe to Arvin:

On screenshot #25, Edward L. Garrett, a prick-for-a-party-member, decided to deride Vohra over his comments:

On screenshot #27, another backstabber Craig Bowden turns on Arvin as if Bowden is truly and gravely in the right here.

Donny Henry is also another fucking backstabber. I know the principles of the Party inside and out, and this putz doesn’t know shit from shinola:

On screenshot #30, Michael Coombs and Donny Henry might as well have been a tag team with the way that they behaved on Facebook that night:

On screenshot #32, at the end of the pic, Marc Montoni finishes his statement with the last line that ends up on at the beginning of screenshot #34. Of course Craig Bowden wasted no time to point out the problems that he had with Arvin’s statement, which makes him a fucking dickhead in my opinion:

More from Bowden himself:

I wish Sarah Daggers hadn’t legitimize his points, but the damage is done. So much for party unity. PUMA!*

Conclusion

Arvin Vohra isn’t the enemy here. The enemy here are the people who believe that war is necessary, that military service is necessary, that combat is good, that government is “great” at “national defense” (which is really national offense, but we can’t say that when we’re fighting four or more wars right now). The Libertarian Party has been fighting a war within itself – the conservatarians versus the purists, the purists versus the ultra-moderates, and the ultra-moderates versus the conservatarians, and so on.

Will Coley was right on in this following video:

And all because of what Arvin said was the following:

He didn’t make that statement on his Facebook post. Yes, he did make it in a private post to Michael Sanchez (who has gone on record admitting that he was the one who released that screenshot of that conversation!) on the site’s server, but he did to make a point: as long as we pay taxes into the system and fund the wars, we are “accessories to murder.” As long as you voluntarily sign up for the military – that is, no one forced you to do it or talked you into it or made you do it – you are an accessory to murder. Soldiers kill. They are there in the deep, uncharted terrains of the Middle East to terminate anyone with equal precision and indiscriminately. It could be a man, a woman, a little boy or girl, or perhaps a baby they kill. Perhaps a cat or a dog. It doesn’t matter. They kill without remorse or fear. They are programmed to kill, and it doesn’t matter what anyone says or does. They kill.

What do these LP members who object to Vohra’s commentary think that they were doing when they were in the service? Serving Venti Starbucks Lattes to the people in the villages, especially on the streets of many cities? Selling electronics to customers who needed them badly? What did they think they were doing?

As Jesse Ventura once said, “That’s doing your job.” [Time Index 4:40]

I can hear the LP members foaming at the mouth at me calling me all sorts of disgusting and vulgar names.

[*Note: PUMA means (P)arty (U)nity (M)y (A)ss.]

The Various Members of the Libertarian Party Pushing for the Persecution of Libertarian National Committee Vice-Chair Arvin Vohra Over His Anti-Military and Anti-War Establishment Part 1

The Various Members of the Libertarian Party Pushing for Persecution of Libertarian National Committee Vice-Chair Arvin Vohra Over His Anti-Military and Anti-War Establishment Comments Part 1

The latest Libertarian Party fallout over Arvin Vohra has become a public relations quagmire, although writer and Libertarian activist, member, and supporter Jill Pyeatt and many commenters on the Independent Political Report‘s post about the ruckus defend Vohra to the hilt. (The fortunate fact is that many of the commenters on IPR disagree with those who are calling for Arvin’s resignation from the Libertarian National Committee, which has been rather silent on the matter the entire time.) The sad reality is that, while many members don’t object to Arvin’s statements, there are many other members – that is, many other various members who object to statements – are the bulk of the Party’s veterans base. The fact that they are offended by Vohra’s statement is that, while it is not surprising, it certainly speaks volumes about their collective character, especially when it seems like they want to tar Vohra and many Libertarians who agree with him with the same political brush.

Here’s what Arvin said on his Facebook account, dated  May 10, 2017 at 9:17 a.m. EST:

To be more descriptive of what Cole Ebel said to Corbin Brown on the same post, the following was said:

Here are the rest of the comments as they have been presented from May 11 to the 14th:

      

Of course, there are more screenshots of the post, but it’s clear that half the member base want to oust Vohra and the other half* are defending him to the hilt.

I will post more of this nonsense in Part 2 either tomorrow night or sometime Monday.

[*Note: I’m one of the “other half” defending Arvin with everything I can muster. These neoconservatives a.k.a. pro-war fucks who have invaded the Party cannot and must not win. They are wrong all the way, and I don’t care. They are paid hit men whether they like it or not. I defend Arvin’s right to free speech as specified under the First Amendment. While he must take full responsibility for his statement, that doesn’t change the fact that he’s fucking spot-on, and, if that pisses off the LP veterans, so fucking be it.

While I value their military service and their desire and willingness to defend this country, let’s not forget one thing: no one forced them to sign up for the service, whether it’s the Air Force, the Army, the Marine Corp., or the Navy. No one strongarmed them. No one even told or ordered them to join either one of those military organizations. They joined out of their own volition.

And, while I’m on a rant here, they weren’t even drafted to fight foreign wars. They made that choice on their own. That’s on them. That’s the point Arvin was getting at. These men and women who were in the service – and many others still are – knew what they were signing up the second they signed on the dotted line at their military recruiters’ offices. A few people in the comments say that, if they didn’t shoot to kill or follow orders, they would either be jailed or dead. I will say it again: no one forced them to join the service. They made that conscious choice. Guess what? They must live with it.

And if their lives were going to be in jeopardy, that’s understandable. They would have to defend themselves. But they didn’t have to join. No one has to. There’s no draft, only voluntary military service.

It’s that simple.]

The Various Members of the Libertarian Party Pushing for Persecution of Libertarian National Committee Vice-Chair Arvin Vohra Over His Anti-Military and Anti-War Establishment Comments Part 2